Minnesota

Caution is the course that many industrial tenants are pursuing in the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, especially when it comes to leasing or acquiring new space. This is partly to do with being prudent and partly to do with firms' continued inability to dislodge money from the frozen capital markets. “More so than I have ever seen in the market, companies are very reluctant to consider relocating,” says Bill Ritter, senior vice president of Welsh Companies. “Any company that has the ability to consolidate or renew is looking at that versus the cost associated with physical relocation.” For those that are in the market for space, Ritter has optimistic news. “I have never seen a better time to be a tenant in over 25 years of experience leasing and selling industrial real estate,” he says. Ritter goes on to say that a unique trend is developing in which landlords are trying to get their tenants to renew 12 to 18 months before the end of their lease terms, and they are willing to rewrite the current rental agreement — with discounted rates — if the tenant agrees. “Sure, the landlord is giving something up, but if that …

“Ride out the storm,” may be the refrain of industrial developers, landlords and tenants, as the recession and the resulting uncertainties have all players in the Twin Cities commercial real estate industry watching carefully and exploring their options. For starters, development has ground to a halt. This may be the silver lining, however, since it will enable the market to more easily absorb existing product and sublease space, thus allowing the market to recover more quickly when the economy begins to turn the corner. There is a small amount of spec product on the market, but this represents such a small amount that it has little to no impact. Fortunately, the restrained development has allowed the industrial market to catch its breath. During the first quarter, absorption fell in positive territory, with nearly 197,000 square feet absorbed, leading to a slight decline in vacancy from 10.1 percent to start the year to 9.9 percent by the first quarter’s end. The modest absorption has largely been driven by smaller deals. Another side effect has been the collapse of the land market. Land prices have come down as much as 50 percent from their highs during a flurry of activity some 12 …