Reid-Pull-Quote

Opening on Time: What Multi-Unit Retail, Restaurant Teams Should Demand From Their General Contactors

by Taylor Williams

By Robert Reid, principal, Corporeal Visions Inc.

Every multi-unit retail and restaurant operator knows the math on a late opening.

Rent starts on the commencement date whether the doors are open or not. Staff have been hired and trained against a date that is now moving. Marketing has been spent. Equipment is sitting in a warehouse accruing storage fees. A four-week slip on a single restaurant can easily cost tens of thousands of dollars in carried rent, payroll and lost sales, and for a team opening several units a year, those slips compound.

What separates the teams that open on time from the teams that don’t is rarely the quality of the finishes or the size of the budget. It is whether the general contractor (GC) was made to own a handful of coordination points that fall between the cracks of a typical bid. Facility and construction managers who put these items on the table before the contract is signed, and hold the GC to them through turnover, tend to open when they said they would.

Robert Reid, Corporeal Visions

Demand A Written Lndlord-To-Tenant Handoff

Most late openings trace back to the first week, not the last. A tenant build-out starts on the assumption that the landlord’s work is done: the shell is delivered, utilities are stubbed where the lease exhibit says they are, the slab is at the right elevation and the demising walls are in place. In practice, “delivered” spaces arrive with gas service undersized for a cook line, electrical service that stops at a house panel three tenants away or a grease interceptor that exists on the lease exhibit and nowhere else.

The GC should walk the space with the tenant’s representative and the landlord’s representative before mobilizing and produce a short written list of what is in place, what is missing and who is paying for the gap. That document is the tenant’s leverage. Without it, every base-building shortfall becomes a change order on the tenant’s side of the ledger, and every change order carries a schedule hit on top of the cost.

Multi-unit teams should make this walk a contract deliverable, not a courtesy. If the GC will not commit to it, that says something about how the rest of the job will be run.

Demand a Submittal Schedule Tied To The Rough-in Date

Long-lead equipment is the second most common reason a restaurant or retail store opens late, and it is almost entirely preventable.

Walk-in coolers, exhaust hoods, rooftop HVAC units, custom millwork, storefront systems and electrical switchgear can all carry lead times measured in months. The problem is not that they take long. The problem is that they are ordered after the rough-in has already closed the walls and ceilings.

A hood that arrives with a different duct collar location than the drawings assumed means opening a finished ceiling. A walk-in that shows up two inches wider than the framed opening means tearing out a wall. A rooftop unit that misses the crane date means paying for a second crane and a second street closure.

The fix is a submittal log with dates that work backward from the rough-in. The GC should be able to show, for every long-lead item, the date it must be released, the date shop drawings are due, the date the tenant’s equipment vendor must confirm dimensions and utility requirements and the date the item lands on site. Facility teams that ask for that log at the kickoff meeting — and review it weekly — take most of the surprise out of the schedule. Teams that leave it to the GC’s memory usually find out about a missing item the week it was supposed to be installed.

Demand Utility Sequencing in The Schedule, not The Field

For restaurants, the kitchen exhaust system is where schedules go to die.

The hood, the exhaust fan, the make-up air unit, the fire suppression system and the gas line each involve a different subcontractor, a different inspector and often a different permit. They also depend on each other: the gas cannot be turned on until the suppression system is tested; the suppression system cannot be tested until the hood is set and the fan is running; and the fan cannot run until the electrical is energized and the roof penetration is flashed.

A GC who has done this work will lay those steps out in order, with the inspections between them, before the first duct is hung. A GC who has not will discover the sequence one failed inspection at a time. The cost of a missed sequence is not just the re-inspection fee; it is the two or three weeks of waiting for the next available inspection slot while the opening date slides.

Retail and restaurant construction managers should ask a simple question during GC selection: “Walk me through your hood, make-up air and gas sequence, including which inspections happen in which order.” The answer tells you more than the bid number.

Demand Jurisdiction-Specific Permitting Knowledge

Permitting is not one process.

In the Northern Virginia and Maryland market, for example, a tenant fit-out in Fairfax County, Loudoun County, Prince William County, Montgomery County, Prince George’s County or Anne Arundel County can face different plan review timelines, different health department requirements, different fire marshal expectations for suppression systems and different rules about when a third-party inspector can be used to speed things up. Some jurisdictions require a separate health department approval before the building permit is issued; others run the two in parallel. Some allow expedited review for a fee; others do not.

A GC that works across a region should be able to tell a multi-unit team, before the lease is signed, roughly how long the permit will take in that specific county and what the sequence of approvals looks like. That number belongs in the pro forma next to rent commencement, because a permit that takes twelve weeks instead of six is a six-week delay before the first stud goes up. When the GC cannot answer the question for the county in question, the team is carrying the permitting risk itself.

Demand a Closeout Plan

The last two weeks of a build-out are where a well-run job and a poorly run job look the same on the surface and completely different on the calendar.

The certificate of occupancy depends on a final building inspection, a final fire inspection, a final health inspection for food service and sometimes a separate zoning or use-permit sign-off. Each has prerequisites: the suppression test certificate, the backflow preventer test, the grease interceptor inspection, the electrical final, the elevator or lift certification where applicable.

The GC should hand the tenant a closeout checklist at the start of the job, not the end, showing every inspection and the documents each one requires. Facility teams that review that list at the midpoint of construction catch the missing test certificate in week six, when it costs nothing, instead of on the day the inspector refuses to sign.

The Bottom Line

None of these demands cost money. They cost the GC a few hours of planning and a willingness to put coordination in writing.

For multi-unit retail and restaurant teams that are measured on opening dates, that is the trade to make. The bid with the lowest number and no answers to these five questions is rarely the lowest-cost bid once the carried rent is counted.

Robert Reid is principal of Corporeal Visions, Inc., a design-build contractor in Delaplane, Virginia serving retail and restaurant tenants. 


You may also like